A systematic literature review (SLR) seeks to locate and assess all pertinent literature on a subject to arrive at findings regarding the issue at hand. “The purpose of conducting systematic reviews with systematic literature services USA is to shed light on the current status of studies and the conclusions that may be advanced from it.” [Feak and Swales, 2009, page 3]
With the use of an SLR, we can see where things stand in terms of studies on a subject and where questions still need answering in relation to a certain research issue. Pursuing a thorough methodology boosts the dependability of the chosen literature as well as decreases biases induced by an excessively narrow selection of accessible material (Tranfield, Denyer & Smart, 2003). The search process is unique in that it begins with the formulation of an objective for the study as well as ends with the establishment of criteria for inclusion and exclusion. To get a full picture of a research topic, people mostly use literature databases like Web of Science or Business Source Comprehensive, yet they also do manual searches like reviewing reference lists inappropriate sources as well as searching for unpublished literature.
One of your tasks as a researcher could be to compile relevant literature. On the other hand, what sort of evaluation is required of you? What kind of literature review should it be? A regular one or a systematic one? We will discuss the rationale for conducting a systematic literature review, how it differs from a literature review, along with other key points of this type of study.
What Is The Purpose Of The Systematic Literature Review?
A systematic literature review’s goal is straightforward. With systematic literature assignment services, learn how its primary function is to pose a broad outline of a certain study topic. By itself, the issue is rather specific, fitting the bill for a survey of relevant literature. A targeted inquiry concerning potential health effects in a clinical setting is one example.
A systematic review of literature differs significantly from the typical research theses that include a literature review in terms of its elements (more on this below). In addition, multiple primary authors are usually involved throughout a systematic literature evaluation due to the specificity of the study issue. A comprehensive literature review is more involved; thus, it is reasonable to assign it to multiple researchers.
Preliminary protocol decisions will ensure that the systematic literature review adheres to strict guidelines. This calls for meticulous preparation as well as a well-thought-out search approach that is in harmony with the unique research subject. Research methodologies, database names, and search dates must all be publicly available in a systematic literature review for other researchers to have faith in its thoroughness and emphasis.
A large number of systematic literature reviews have their roots in the medical field. Question sets supported by evidence are now also part of it. Qualities of a high-quality systematic literature review consist of, among other things, the following:
● A brief and easy-to-understand synopsis
● The examined study
● Extensive treatment on the topics
● availability and inequality of the reviewed research.
Literature Review vs Systematic Review
It is the original research topic that distinguishes a literature review from a systematic review. A typical literature review is considerably broader in scope than a systematic review, which is very targeted and comprehensive. For instance, much like the other kinds of academic papers, a literature review has certain standard components. In other words, it has an abstract, methods section, body, and conclusion sections, along with a citation or reference list.
Yet, due to the unique nature of the research issue and the need for openness and participation, a systematic review has its own unique set of elements. As an example, the following will be part of the systematic review:
● Requirements for research inclusion
● Outline of the method for doing systematic searches
● Evaluation of the reliability of the studies that were considered
● Analysis and interpretation of the empirical studies incorporated into the review
You know that in contrast to a topical overview or short, the systematic literature review entails a lot more effort and depth in its compilation. The systematic literature review, from start to finish, can easily take several years. You can have the assistance of a systematic literature services USA on this topic. However, a systematic literature review inherently yields extremely useful data for practitioners along with other researchers.
Please do not take this as an attack on the merits of the traditional literature review. The main difference between the two kinds of research reviews is that they seek to address distinct questions and serve distinct functions within the realm of study and evidence-based writing.
Meta-Analysis vs Systematic Literature Review
The assumption that a systematic review of literature is synonymous with a meta-analysis is reasonable. However, a meta-analysis usually compares various studies to find contradictions or discrepancies, as opposed to a systematic review that may incorporate multiple studies to address a particular issue. Learn more about it and know how to write a systematic literature review with the help of a systematic literature Writer.
Important features
Important features of reviews that evaluate a whole are:
● Clearly defined goals
● A repeatable procedure that includes clearly stated inclusion criteria
● methodical search approach to find all papers that match those criteria.
● With systematic literature services, learn to evaluate research quality.
● A compilation of the results from the research that made it into the review
Protocols of Systematic Reviews
Preliminary plans developed by the researcher serve as the compass for systematic reviews. Protocols describe these plans.
Common components of systematic review protocols are:
● Why this systematic review was necessary.
● The procedure followed to conduct the systematic review, which includes selecting of studies to include and exclude.
Conclusion
When current knowledge is lacking, a systematic review may fill those gaps and contribute to the academic community’s understanding. A systematic review, on the other hand, calls for a unique set of procedures, each of which calls for a unique set of resources and methods. You can get an online assignment help USA to learn more about it. Getting to and making use of these resources isn’t always a picnic. By completing the several phases described in this review of literature, a researcher can comprehend and plan a systematic review. It is an enormous undertaking to summarize all the ideas and methods needed in performing a systematic review in just one essay.
About Author
